`architecture` option for runners that are not amd64 #10

New issue

Closed

opened 2024-03-04 09:17:37 +00:00 by leana8959 · 1 comment

leana8959 commented

2024-03-04 09:17:37 +00:00

Contributor

Hello,

Since my runner is running on arm64, I had to fork the project and change the architecture for it to work (the binary of tea).

I have two ideas to implement this:

parse the output of uname -m and decide which arch to use
expose an option architecture to users of this action for them to override based on the arch of their runner

If it's a change that might be useful for others too, I could create a PR.

Thanks =)

Hello, Since my runner is running on arm64, I had to fork the project and change the architecture for it to work (the binary of `tea`). I have two ideas to implement this: - parse the output of `uname -m` and decide which arch to use - expose an option `architecture` to users of this action for them to override based on the arch of their runner If it's a change that might be useful for others too, I could create a PR. Thanks =)

earl-warren commented

2024-03-04 09:53:30 +00:00

Owner

Absolutely! A very welcome addition. You will see there is a rather complete test suite to exercise this action. If you get it running with an ARM64 runner and produce AMD64 releases, that would be quite useful for other people.