Update Tea 0.9.0 -> 0.10.1 #85

Merged
earl-warren merged 1 commit from Mynacol/forgejo-release:only-tea-update into main 2025-09-10 05:28:12 +00:00
Contributor

This is generally a good idea.
But it also fixes my issues with this action. For comparison, here is a run with v2.7.2 and with this branch.

This is a split-off from #82 to have small PRs.

This is generally a good idea. But it also fixes my issues with this action. For comparison, here is a run with [v2.7.2](https://codeberg.org/Mynacol/delegacy-rpz/actions/runs/59) and with [this branch](https://codeberg.org/Mynacol/delegacy-rpz/actions/runs/58). This is a split-off from https://code.forgejo.org/actions/forgejo-release/pulls/82 to have small PRs.
Author
Contributor

@earl-warren can you have a look at this? TIA

@earl-warren can you have a look at this? TIA
Owner

You are very patient 👍 Could you please update the description to describe what problem it fixes and how to reproduce it? I'm sure I could figure that out by looking at your workflows but that would take more time and, as you have observed, the attention span of reviewers is not great. Having a crystal clear description as well as bite-sized pull requests go a long way to get them merged.

You are very patient 👍 Could you please update the description to describe what problem it fixes and how to reproduce it? I'm sure I could figure that out by looking at your workflows but that would take more time and, as you have observed, the attention span of reviewers is not great. Having a crystal clear description as well as bite-sized pull requests go a long way to get them merged.
Author
Contributor

I'm honestly not quite sure why the runs differ in that way. What I can say is that updating the Tea client fixed at least one problem, which has led to an invalid URL when downloading the latest release of a project.

As already said – this PR should really be merge-able without any specific bug report. It updates a dependency, which in turn updated its dependencies. Standard maintenance stuff.

I'm honestly not quite sure why the runs differ in that way. What I can say is that updating the Tea client fixed at least one problem, which has led to an invalid URL when downloading the latest release of a project. As already said – this PR should really be merge-able without any specific bug report. It updates a dependency, which in turn updated its dependencies. Standard maintenance stuff.
earl-warren force-pushed only-tea-update from bc22a9db8a
All checks were successful
/ integration (pull_request) Successful in 18m59s
to 72e579819d
All checks were successful
/ tests (pull_request) Successful in 12s
/ integration (pull_request) Successful in 17m49s
2025-09-09 08:14:57 +00:00
Compare
Owner

I have rebased this PR to differentiate the tests that previously had the same name. Let see if they both are happy about this upgrade.

I have rebased this PR to differentiate the tests that previously had the same name. Let see if they both are happy about this upgrade.
earl-warren deleted branch only-tea-update 2025-09-10 05:28:12 +00:00
earl-warren referenced this pull request from a commit 2025-09-10 05:28:14 +00:00
Owner

A release was tagged.

A release was tagged.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
actions/forgejo-release!85
No description provided.