infrastructure/documentation
6
4
Fork 2
Code Issues 5 Pull requests Activity

restructure disk on hetzner01 #69

New issue
Closed
opened 2026-01-16 13:45:09 +00:00 by viceice · 2 comments
viceice commented 2026-01-16 13:45:09 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Currently all act caches for all runner are stored on root partition which can cause bad issues.

So we need to refactor:

  • stop all runners
  • destroy lxc containers
  • delete contents of /var/lib/forgejo-runner
  • backup /var/lib/lxc
  • create lvm on /dev/md4
  • create lv's for /var/lib/lxc and /var/lib/forgejo-runner with xfs
  • mount /var/lib/lxc and /var/lib/forgejo-runner to new lv's
  • restore /var/lib/lxc
Currently all act caches for all runner are stored on root partition which can cause bad issues. So we need to refactor: - [x] stop all runners - [x] destroy lxc containers - [x] delete contents of `/var/lib/forgejo-runner` - [ ] backup `/var/lib/lxc` - [x] create lvm on `/dev/md4` - [x] create lv's for `/var/lib/lxc` and `/var/lib/forgejo-runner` with xfs - [x] mount `/var/lib/lxc` and `/var/lib/forgejo-runner` to new lv's - [ ] restore `/var/lib/lxc` --- - https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/436
viceice added the due date 2026-01-19 2026-01-16 13:45:50 +00:00
viceice self-assigned this 2026-01-19 08:44:50 +00:00
viceice commented 2026-01-19 10:09:19 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

there was nothing to backup

df -h
Filesystem                        Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
udev                               32G     0   32G   0% /dev
tmpfs                             6.3G  1.3M  6.3G   1% /run
/dev/md3                          491G   26G  441G   6% /
tmpfs                              32G     0   32G   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs                             5.0M     0  5.0M   0% /run/lock
/dev/md2                          989M  124M  815M  14% /boot
/dev/mapper/data-lxc              1.0T   49G  975G   5% /var/lib/lxc
/dev/mapper/data-forgejo--runner  1.0T  7.2G 1017G   1% /var/lib/forgejo-runner
/dev/md0                          256M  160K  256M   1% /boot/efi
tmpfs                             6.3G     0  6.3G   0% /run/user/1000
there was nothing to backup ```sh df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on udev 32G 0 32G 0% /dev tmpfs 6.3G 1.3M 6.3G 1% /run /dev/md3 491G 26G 441G 6% / tmpfs 32G 0 32G 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock /dev/md2 989M 124M 815M 14% /boot /dev/mapper/data-lxc 1.0T 49G 975G 5% /var/lib/lxc /dev/mapper/data-forgejo--runner 1.0T 7.2G 1017G 1% /var/lib/forgejo-runner /dev/md0 256M 160K 256M 1% /boot/efi tmpfs 6.3G 0 6.3G 0% /run/user/1000 ```
viceice commented 2026-01-19 10:10:25 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

the new lv's are using xfs with noatime for perf

debian@hetzner01:~$ cat /etc/fstab
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
# /dev/md/0
UUID=7DD6-A3F8 /boot/efi vfat umask=0077 0 1
# /dev/md/1
UUID=e665675f-ff3a-4445-8120-aa5fbd8b3910 none swap sw 0 0
# /dev/md/2
UUID=3444f8af-903d-428e-8fb6-3c6de6fca683 /boot ext3 defaults 0 0
# /dev/md/3
UUID=fd909ce2-5c22-46af-97d5-457b05d779b9 / ext4 defaults 0 0
# /dev/md/4
#UUID=8fa675d1-ec91-4cd9-84ab-9602bb764844 /var/lib/lxc ext4 defaults 0 0

UUID="6344391a-3be4-4c44-917a-7786e833e7bd" /var/lib/lxc xfs defaults,noatime 0 0
UUID="ac5390a2-a53d-4597-8996-7976fb8cfafc" /var/lib/forgejo-runner xfs defaults,noatime 0 0
the new lv's are using xfs with `noatime` for perf ```sh debian@hetzner01:~$ cat /etc/fstab proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 # /dev/md/0 UUID=7DD6-A3F8 /boot/efi vfat umask=0077 0 1 # /dev/md/1 UUID=e665675f-ff3a-4445-8120-aa5fbd8b3910 none swap sw 0 0 # /dev/md/2 UUID=3444f8af-903d-428e-8fb6-3c6de6fca683 /boot ext3 defaults 0 0 # /dev/md/3 UUID=fd909ce2-5c22-46af-97d5-457b05d779b9 / ext4 defaults 0 0 # /dev/md/4 #UUID=8fa675d1-ec91-4cd9-84ab-9602bb764844 /var/lib/lxc ext4 defaults 0 0 UUID="6344391a-3be4-4c44-917a-7786e833e7bd" /var/lib/lxc xfs defaults,noatime 0 0 UUID="ac5390a2-a53d-4597-8996-7976fb8cfafc" /var/lib/forgejo-runner xfs defaults,noatime 0 0 ```
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
bug

Something is not working

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature

  
help wanted

Need some help

  
invalid

Something is wrong

  
question

More information is needed

  
wontfix

This won't be fixed

  
Compat/Breaking

Breaking change that won't be backward compatible

  
Kind/Bug

Something is not working

  
Kind/Documentation

Documentation changes

  
Kind/Enhancement

Improve existing functionality

  
Kind/Feature

New functionality

  
Kind/Security

This is security issue

  
Kind/Testing

Issue or pull request related to testing

  
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium

  
Reviewed
Confirmed
Issue has been confirmed

  
Reviewed
Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists

  
Reviewed
Invalid
Invalid issue

  
Reviewed
Won't Fix
This issue won't be fixed

  
Status
Abandoned
Somebody has started to work on this but abandoned work

  
Status
Blocked
Something is blocking this issue or pull request

  
Status
Need More Info
Feedback is required to reproduce issue or to continue work

No labels
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Compat/Breaking
Kind/Bug
Kind/Documentation
Kind/Enhancement
Kind/Feature
Kind/Security
Kind/Testing
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
Reviewed
Invalid
Reviewed
Won't Fix
Status
Abandoned
Status
Blocked
Status
Need More Info
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
viceice
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

2026-01-19

Reference
infrastructure/documentation#69
No description provided.