Is the {upload,download}-artifact@v4 fork still necessary? #159

Open
opened 2024-03-21 13:44:00 +00:00 by earl-warren · 0 comments
Owner

forked version of the action that claims to not be GHES are advertised in the comment of the mirror at:

and they are made available at:

To verify it is still needed, modify https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/src/branch/main/actions/example-artifacts-v4/.forgejo/workflows to use the mirror instead of the fork:

./end-to-end.sh test_actions 7.0-test

If it fails, it is still needed. Otherwise it can be removed.

forked version of the action that claims to **not** be GHES are advertised in the comment of the mirror at: * https://code.forgejo.org/actions/upload-artifact * https://code.forgejo.org/actions/download-artifact and they are made available at: * https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/upload-artifact/src/tag/v4 * https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/download-artifact/src/tag/v4 To verify it is still needed, modify https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/src/branch/main/actions/example-artifacts-v4/.forgejo/workflows to use the mirror instead of the fork: ```sh ./end-to-end.sh test_actions 7.0-test ``` If it fails, it is still needed. Otherwise it can be removed.
earl-warren added the due date 2024-05-23 2024-03-21 13:44:15 +00:00
twenty-panda added the
Kind/Testing
label 2024-03-21 14:11:55 +00:00
twenty-panda changed title from Is the {upload,download}-artifacts@v4 fork still necessary? to Is the {upload,download}-artifact@v4 fork still necessary? 2024-03-21 14:12:24 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

2024-05-23

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: forgejo/runner#159
No description provided.